Controversial Treatments and Legislative Change
Course Outcomes addressed in this assignment
MN506-3: Evaluate the implications of the effects of contemporary health policy on providers and consumers.
MN506-4: Assess the legislative and policy-making strategies specific to scope of practice and nursing roles that influence health care services and practice.
The group will choose a health care treatment option that is controversial and maybe costly. Describe the positive and negative benefits from the treatment, evidence of effectiveness, and the potential harm of a different treatment option. What strategies would you use to advocate for a legislative change in your state to influence insurance coverage for this treatment.
- Choose a controversial health care treatment option. Describe the treatment.
- Describe the social and legal controversy associated with your controversial treatment.
- Describe the evidence that supports the effectiveness of the controversial treatment.
- Describe the evidence that does not support the effectiveness of the controversial treatment.
- Compare and contrast the positive and negative benefits or harm of the controversial treatment.
- Compare and contrast positive and negative aspects of available traditional treatments.
- Compare and contrast the costs of the controversial treatment with the costs associated with traditional treatments
- Describe the required process for legislative change to occur in your state.
- Describe a strategies that you would you use at the local and state level to advocate for a legislative change in your state that would influence insurance coverage for this treatment.
- Provide an estimated timeline for your legislative change to occur. Use the steps describe in required process for legislative change for your state.
Note:
- This is a fact-based Assignment that will not include your opinion.
- This will require research and support for what is written.
- The Assignment should be in your words after reading the scholarly and fact-based publications and have proper citations. There should be no quotations. The professor wants to hear your voice as a masters trained nurse.
- The paper should have a minimum of seven citations and some of these should be case law or applicable statutes
How to solve
Unit 8 Assignment Controversial Treatments and Legislative Change Nursing Assignment Help
Introduction:
The assignment focuses on controversial treatments and the potential for legislative change to influence insurance coverage for these treatments. Students are required to select a health care treatment option that is considered controversial and potentially costly. They will then evaluate the positive and negative benefits of the treatment, the evidence supporting its effectiveness, as well as the potential harm of alternative treatment options. Additionally, students are expected to compare and contrast the positive and negative aspects of traditional treatments and assess the associated costs. The assignment concludes with an exploration of the required process for legislative change and the strategies that can be employed to advocate for such changes at the local and state levels. The estimated timeline for the legislative change is also requested.
Answer:
1. The controversial health care treatment option chosen for this assignment is stem cell therapy. Stem cell therapy involves the use of stem cells to treat diseases and injuries by renewing or repairing damaged tissues and organs. It has garnered attention and sparked controversy due to its association with the use of embryonic stem cells, which raises ethical concerns for some individuals.
2. Stem cell therapy is at the center of a social and legal controversy mainly due to the use of embryonic stem cells. This controversy revolves around the ethical implications of obtaining embryonic stem cells, as it involves the destruction of human embryos. The debate centers on the perception of when life begins and the moral status of the embryo.
3. Numerous studies and research provide evidence supporting the effectiveness of stem cell therapy. These studies demonstrate the regenerative potential of stem cells in treating various conditions such as spinal cord injuries, Parkinson’s disease, and heart disease. The ability of stem cells to differentiate into different cell types and repair damaged tissues is a key factor contributing to the effectiveness of this treatment.
4. There is also evidence that challenges the effectiveness of stem cell therapy in certain cases. Some studies suggest that the differentiation and integration of stem cells into the host tissue may not occur as expected, leading to limited or ineffective outcomes. Additionally, concerns regarding the potential for tumor formation and immune rejection have been raised, highlighting potential risks associated with this treatment.
5. Stem cell therapy presents both positive and negative benefits or harm. The positive benefits include the potential for tissue regeneration and the treatment of debilitating diseases and injuries. However, the negative aspects include the controversy surrounding the use of embryonic stem cells, potential risks such as tumor formation, and the high cost of the treatment.
6. Traditional treatments available for various conditions may offer alternative options to stem cell therapy. These traditional treatments include medication, physical therapy, and surgical interventions. While these treatments may have less controversy and potentially lower costs, they may not provide the regenerative potential offered by stem cell therapy.
7. The costs associated with stem cell therapy can vary depending on the specific condition being treated and the method of stem cell acquisition. However, generally, stem cell therapy tends to be expensive due to the complexity and specialized nature of the treatment. On the other hand, traditional treatments may have lower costs but may require long-term management and ongoing healthcare expenses.
8. The required process for legislative change in the state must be followed to influence insurance coverage for stem cell therapy. This process typically involves drafting a bill, submitting it to the appropriate legislative body, committee review, public hearings, amendments, and voting. If the bill is approved, it goes through the process of enacting the law, which includes executive branch review and potential revisions.
9. Strategies that can be used at the local and state level to advocate for legislative change include:
– Building coalitions and partnerships with healthcare providers, patient advocacy groups, and professional organizations to increase visibility and support for the legislative change.
– Engaging in public education campaigns to raise awareness about the benefits of stem cell therapy and its potential positive impact on healthcare outcomes.
– Lobbying policymakers and legislators through meetings, letters, and testimonies to present evidence-based arguments and demonstrate the need for insurance coverage for stem cell therapy.
– Collaborating with local and state media outlets to share success stories and testimonials from patients who have benefited from stem cell therapy, highlighting the importance of insurance coverage.
10. The estimated timeline for legislative change to occur can vary based on the specific state and the complexity of the issue. However, a rough estimate of the timeline could include several months to a year or more. This time frame accounts for the drafting and introduction of the bill, committee reviews, public hearings, potential amendments, and the legislative voting process. The time required for executive branch review and final implementation of the law should also be considered.
