Findings from the Developing stage of your investigation.

Developing stage


NOTE: In this handout the term organisation refers to any financial services provider or government agency.



Carrying out your investigation


This handout covers the Developing stage of your investigation. This involves meeting the brief you have developed by carrying out your plan.


Like the Planning stage, you have to write up your findings from the Developing stage of your investigation. Your report should be 2,500–3,500 words and should contain four main sections:


A detailed explanation of how the issue affects the organisation or organisations/customers chosen. The explanation should be justified by explicit reference to the data collected and to concepts covered as in the mandatory units, or relevant optional units, of the group award. The explanation should be consistent with objectives set at the Planning stage.


Analysis of the primary and secondary sources of information and data collected.


An assessment of the implications of these effects for the chosen organisation or organisations/customers should be analysed in relation to the organisation(s), the financial services environment and the impact upon customers and should make reference to concepts and topics studied within the mandatory section of the group award.


A statement of the conclusions drawn from the investigation and any appropriate recommendations to be made to the organisation(s). These should be explicitly related to the issues being investigated and the needs of customers.


Your report should consist of 2,500–3,500 words, and must be presented in a format suitable for a business report. You must include a contents page, a summary of findings, acknowledgements and references. Your evidence may be supplemented by evidence provided orally by yourself in a discussion with the lecturer. If this is done, a record of the main points of the discussion should be recorded.


You must continue to maintain your log, which must record any activities undertaken, resources used and time allocated. You should also record deviations from your plan and keep a reflective record of what things worked, what did not and what problems you encounter. You should retain evidence of your progress and experience of the Development stage of the investigation and your own personal development. This will support you in the Evaluating stage by matching your experiences against the plan.


This handout looks at each of these sections. It concludes with some comments on writing up your report.


You will see, as you read through, that there is no requirement to describe in detail how you actually carried out the investigation.


Section 1 — How the issue affects your chosen organisation or organisations/ customers


Section 2 — Analysis of the primary and secondary sources of information and data collected


In this part, you should explain how the issue you have investigated affects the organisation or organisations/customers you have studied. You are required to make reference to the data that you have collected and it is therefore likely that you will incorporate the data analysis within this section.


You must justify your explanation by making explicit reference to:


both primary and secondary data that you have collected and analysed


concepts you have covered in the mandatory, or financial services related optional, units of the group award


For example, if your investigation sets out to identify advantages and disadvantages of something, then this section of your report will summarise the advantages and disadvantages that you have found during your investigation. For each one, you should explain why it is an advantage or disadvantage.


You should support your explanation in three ways:


with data (for example, positive responses to a survey)

by reference to relevant concepts that you have studied in the mandatory units as part of the group award (for example, something may be an advantage because it is consistent with the predictions of a theory or with research evidence)

your explanation should be consistent with the objectives created in the Planning stage


You may find it helpful to present some of your data in appendices and refer to them in the main body of you report. Appendices do not count towards the overall word limit.


Section 3 — An assessment of the implications


In this part, you should assess the implications for your organisation(s) of the effects you have discussed in the first part (Stage 1 and 2) of your report. You must focus on the impact upon customers. The possible implications will vary from project to project, and may involve some speculation, but where possible should be grounded in specific evidence.

Section 4 — Conclusions from your investigation


In this final section of your report, you should summarise the conclusions you have drawn from your assessment in Section 3 on the previous page.


You must make sure of two things:

your conclusions and recommendations follow directly from your investigation

your conclusions and recommendations are directly related to the needs of customers


One way to present this section is to list your conclusions and recommendations and show how each follows from your investigation and, where appropriate, how it relates to the needs of customers.

Click here to request for this assignment help

#Findings #Developing #stage #investigation

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

Ethics and Law Discussion

Health Serv Organization Mgt “Ethics and Law” There are numerous end-of-life issues that we have all heard about in the news, but how are these

constructivism & humanism

rior to engaging in this discussion, please read chapters five and six in your e-book and review the Instructor Guidance. If your last name begins

HSA 4421- Legal Aspects of Healthcare

Assignment: Write a two page intro and conclusion on the case study provided. Also write an abstract on the paper. APA FORMAT! Attached you will

Language, Identity & Power

Critical linguists (e.g. Fairclough, 1989, 1995, Van Dijk, 1989, Wodak, 2011) argue that the media has the power to represent, construct and challenge particular identities.

Michael pollanand Mary maxfield

Description First Writing for Paper One: Summarizing/Quotation “They Say/ I Say” Chapter Two and Three Assignment: This Writing should be two (2) pages and follow

New questions

SEU Hypothesis Testing Issues Discussion

Expert Solution Preview Introduction: In the field of medical education, professors are responsible for designing and conducting lectures, evaluating student performance, and providing feedback through

SEU Random Sampling Discussion

Reply to this post: In arrange to choose an arbitrary test, a subset of subjects must be picked so that each subject within the populace

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!