Covid pandemics

Consider a topic (mental health, HIV, opioid epidemic, pandemics, obesity, prescription drug prices, or many others) that rises to the presidential level.   


1. How did the current (Biden) and previous (Trump) presidents handle the problem? 

2. What would you do differently?  

3. Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.

4. Consider a population health topic that rises to the presidential agenda level. Which social determinant most affects this health issue? How did two recent presidents handle the problem? What would you do differently? 

5.  Utilize at least 3 scholarly references and APA referencing 


Past President’s Approaches 

What could be Done Differently

How to solve

Covid pandemics

Nursing Assignment Help

The topic of discussion in this assignment is the COVID-19 pandemic, which has significantly impacted the world and risen to the presidential level. We will evaluate the approaches of the current president, Joe Biden, and the previous president, Donald Trump, towards handling this crisis. Additionally, we will consider potential improvements in addressing this issue and examine how federal agendas promote healthcare issues. Furthermore, we will examine a population health topic that has reached the presidential agenda level and analyze the social determinant that most affects this health issue. Finally, we will reflect on how recent presidents handled this problem and propose our own strategy if given the opportunity.

1. How did the current (Biden) and previous (Trump) presidents handle the problem?

Both President Biden and President Trump faced the challenge posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. Their approaches differed significantly. President Trump initially downplayed the severity of the virus, emphasizing the need to reopen the economy quickly. His administration focused on the development and acceleration of vaccine development through Operation Warp Speed. However, there were criticisms regarding the lack of a comprehensive national strategy, inconsistent messaging, and insufficient support for public health agencies.

President Biden, on the other hand, took a more proactive approach to address the pandemic. He prioritized a science-based approach, increased funding for testing and vaccine distribution, and implemented stricter public health measures such as mask mandates and social distancing guidelines. The Biden administration also worked towards improving coordination with state and local governments, as well as strengthening international collaborations to tackle the global impact of the pandemic.

2. What would you do differently?

If given the opportunity, there are several areas where improvements can be made in handling the COVID-19 pandemic. Firstly, there should be a greater focus on early and accurate communication of information, particularly regarding the severity and recommended preventive measures. Transparency and consistent messaging are essential in fostering trust and encouraging compliance with public health guidelines.

Secondly, I would advocate for the establishment of a robust national preparedness and response infrastructure. This includes enhancing the capacity for testing, contact tracing, and surveillance in order to detect and mitigate outbreaks early on. It is also crucial to invest in the public health workforce and strengthen partnerships with healthcare providers and community organizations.

Furthermore, efforts should be made to address health disparities that have been exacerbated by the pandemic. This involves ensuring equitable access to healthcare, testing, and vaccination for underserved communities, as well as implementing targeted interventions to address the social determinants of health that contribute to these disparities.

3. Consider how federal agendas promote healthcare issues and how these healthcare issues become agenda priorities.

Federal agendas play a crucial role in promoting healthcare issues and elevating them to agenda priorities. The president has the power to influence the national discourse and set the agenda through policy proposals and executive actions. High-profile healthcare issues often gain attention when they align with the presidential administration’s priorities or public sentiment.

Federal agendas promoting healthcare issues can be shaped through various means, such as legislative proposals, budget allocations, and regulatory actions. Presidents can leverage their influence to highlight specific health concerns and advocate for policy changes. For example, President Biden’s American Rescue Plan allocated significant funding for COVID-19 vaccine distribution and testing, demonstrating his commitment to addressing the pandemic.

Moreover, healthcare issues can become agenda priorities through public pressure and advocacy. Grassroots movements, healthcare professionals, and organizations play a vital role in raising awareness, demanding action, and holding elected officials accountable. Thus, the intersection of public demand, political will, and evidence-based research can significantly impact the inclusion of healthcare issues in the federal agenda.

4. Consider a population health topic that rises to the presidential agenda level. Which social determinant most affects this health issue? How did two recent presidents handle the problem? What would you do differently?

One population health topic that has reached the presidential agenda level is the opioid epidemic. The social determinant that greatly influences this health issue is socioeconomic status and access to healthcare. Economic instability, poverty, and limited access to healthcare contribute to the vulnerability of individuals to opioid misuse and addiction.

Regarding the opioid epidemic, both the Trump and Biden administrations prioritized addressing this crisis, but their approaches differed. President Trump declared the opioid epidemic a public health emergency and focused on limiting the supply of opioids, increasing law enforcement efforts, and promoting non-opioid pain management alternatives. However, criticisms were raised concerning the inadequate allocation of resources towards treatment and prevention initiatives.

President Biden’s approach emphasizes expanding access to evidence-based treatment, enhancing prevention strategies, and reducing the stigma associated with substance use disorders. The Biden administration aims to increase funding for addiction treatment programs, expand access to medications for opioid use disorder, and improve coordination between federal agencies. Additionally, President Biden has emphasized the importance of addressing the underlying social determinants of the opioid epidemic, such as poverty and mental health.

If given the opportunity, I would focus on building a comprehensive and balanced approach that integrates prevention, treatment, and harm reduction strategies. This includes investing in education and awareness campaigns to prevent opioid misuse, improving access to evidence-based treatment modalities, and strengthening collaborations between healthcare providers, community organizations, and law enforcement agencies. Furthermore, I would advocate for policies that address the social determinants of health, such as poverty and access to healthcare, to mitigate the underlying factors contributing to the opioid epidemic.

5. Utilize at least 3 scholarly references and APA referencing.

(References are not provided in this response as the AI language model does not have real-time access to scholarly sources. However, it is recommended that the medical professor utilize current and reputable sources from academic journals, government publications, and reliable healthcare organizations to support their answers and provide accurate APA referencing.)

#Covid #pandemics

Table of Contents

Calculate your order
Pages (275 words)
Standard price: $0.00

Latest Reviews

Impressed with the sample above? Wait there is more

Related Questions

SEU Public Health Payments for Health Services Providers Paper

Insurance is based on pooling of losses, payment for random losses, risk transfer, and indemnification. As a result, insurers use several different approaches to mitigate their risk and set premium rates, including: the fee-for-service method the cost-plus approach population health – capitation For your assignment, evaluate two global payment systems within healthcare and address each of the following items: Define the structure of the payment systems. Identify risk to loss of revenue in each system.  Describe advantages and disadvantages of each system. Identify how pay for performance can be added to each payment system. Expert Solution Preview Introduction: As a Harvard University Professor, I have conducted extensive research on various

Discussion 520

Reflect on a time that you or a family member were a patient. • Describe the healthcare setting and the overall care delivery experience. •

HSM 340 Final Exam

This file of HSM 340 Final Exam gives the solution to:1. (TCO 4) When would it make sense to use a flexible budget as compared

Theorising Diversity

Description Gender and Diversity studies Please write a text commentary on the literature : Fraser, N. (2018). Recognition without ethics? In: McKinnon, C., & Castiglione,

New questions

Don't Let Questions or Concerns Hold You Back - Make a Free Inquiry Now!